ClassicalX: Forums

Classical X :: View topic - How would you define Classical Crossover?
How would you define Classical Crossover?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classical X Forum Index -> General Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nicola



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 210
Location: Borehamwood, Herts

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:39 pm    Post subject: How would you define Classical Crossover? Reply with quote

Obviously, this musical genre is not really 'official' by any means, it doesn't have it's own little section in the record store, most fo the artists are shoved into the easy listening section. Some people describe it as 'popera'.

Whilst popera could fit with some artists like G4 and Russell Watson this doesn't really capture the likes of Katherine Jenkins who does, on the whole, keep to classical pieces. 'Popera' just doesn't fit as a name as it is too narrow in the genre that is classical crossover.

How would I describe classical crossover genre?
It could simply be "classical music with a contempory feel" but I think that is problematic also. Is the likes of Vanessa Mae and G4 a 'contempory feel'? Though this is part of the definition that can't be it alone. No, I think they branch further away so can't call it that. My idea has always been that there are classical elements in the songs. It could be stretched as far as a singer singing pop but with an orchestra (Josh Groban), or they mix pop with folk/traditional songs (such as Hayley Westrnra) Personally, I don't like this stretch and it strectches too far for me. I have to hear a real classical influence in a CD to call it crossover. This doesn't mean the song itself has to be crossover; the singer could be singing operatically but with a pop backing (Keedie). Or the song is classical but it is given a very different treatment such as Sarah Brightmans transitions of 'Un Bel Di' (Which she converted to 'It's a Beautiful Day') or 'La Wally' (Which she converted to 'Question of Honour'). Must important of all a classical crossover artist (for me) has to stretch themselves and experiment with both the classical and pop elements.

Conclusion then: material that takes classical elements with a knack of making it popular using fusions of different genres of music.

When replying try and do one of these lists. It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks, its your personal opinion:

Who I would class as crossover:
Sarah Brightman
Vanessa Mae
Amy Nuttall
Sissel
Keedie
Era
Russell Watson
Katherine Jenkins (only scrapping the barrell here, she is very close to being purely classical, but she has converted some pop songs and has a beat in a few of her songs, she also isn't very experimental)

Artists which are usually called crossover but I don't quite agree:
Josh Groban (Pop)
Hayley Westenra (Folk/Easy Listening)
Aled Jones (Easy Listening)
Emmy Rossum (Classical)
Becky Jane Taylor (Pop/Easy Listening - depends on which album)
_________________
Comprehensive Buying Guide: Sarah Brightman's Discography
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Doppleganger



Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 29
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would define this music as more of a movement rather than an actual genre all by itself. You can attempt to define it but there will always be artists that don't quite fit the description. You could take almost any genre of music and find the same examples within it. I guess I would define a genre (if I had to) by its audience rather than by its artists. Thus it would be right to lump Hayley Westerna and Katherine Jenkins together as their music is, by and large, bought by the same market.

This poses another question. Charlotte Church is a featured artist on this website but who buys her music? Is it mainly the same people that buy G4 or Il Divo albums or is it the same people who buy Girls Aloud or Atomic Kitten tracks? In fact, some people will buy both. Where do you draw the line?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
xotic
ClassicalX
ClassicalX


Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 489
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Honestly ... I have no idea. I have thought about this issue quite often, in fact I think about it whenever I walk through music stores and find Il Divo put into the pop section or Helmut Lotti put into classic. However I could not find a proper definition for myself yet. But I'll go on thinking about it and if I find a definition, I'll let you know. Smile

What I found interesting is the article on crossover in music (not only classical, but in general) on wikipedia. You can have a look here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover_%28music%29.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nicola



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 210
Location: Borehamwood, Herts

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I would define this music as more of a movement rather than an actual genre all by itself. You can attempt to define it but there will always be artists that don't quite fit the description. You could take almost any genre of music and find the same examples within it.


That's a very good theory and I could almost say flawless. An example: In the rock world there are dozens of sub genres and everyone puts them into different categories (which is annoying when I talk about a band being a certain genre and three different forumers jump down my throat saying they aren't metal/melodic they're this, this and this etc) Wouldn't it just be easier to just everything 'rock'? It would be, but it doesn't fit. You can't say Oasis have the same type of music as Nightwish for example but they are both classed as 'rock', though I very much doubt they have the same audience. The same ring trues in classical music. Yes, these artists have classical elements, but wouldn't it be crazy to call Josh Groban 'classical'? He isn't, there needs to be a bit in between. I like the 'movement' idea, but sub genres are very good at making distinctions between artists in the same main genre. It's for this reason, in this moment of time I would call it a genre of music (or sub-genre).

Quote:
Thus it would be right to lump Hayley Westerna and Katherine Jenkins together as their music is, by and large, bought by the same market.

I don't think I can argue with that Smile I do have an argument, but a very weak one, and I can only use myself as an example.

Quote:
This poses another question. Charlotte Church is a featured artist on this website but who buys her music? Is it mainly the same people that buy G4 or Il Divo albums or is it the same people who buy Girls Aloud or Atomic Kitten tracks? In fact, some people will buy both. Where do you draw the line


I bought Charlottes album because of her crossover history. I certain don't own cds by Girls Aloud and Atomic Kitten. But I think I would be in a minority. I think Charlottes pop album has been bought by the pop audience. Charlotte may have left the scene but her fans of her previous albums are still around and her albums are still enjoyed, therefore I think it's ok to have her on here to discuss her classical stuff. If anything her pop enhances her since we can make interesting contrasts and comparisons.
_________________
Comprehensive Buying Guide: Sarah Brightman's Discography
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nicola



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 210
Location: Borehamwood, Herts

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you, Nadine! I'm glad Sarah was a top artist... Laughing

It was very interesting and very accurate. It was about crossover in general though and not just classical crossover (though it briefly mentioned it).

I think classical Crossover has gone further than what Wikipedia describes.
_________________
Comprehensive Buying Guide: Sarah Brightman's Discography
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
xotic
ClassicalX
ClassicalX


Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 489
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doppleganger wrote:
I guess I would define a genre (if I had to) by its audience rather than by its artists.


What does - in your opinion - a typical classical crossover audience look like? I'm just curious, because I think it's difficult to find a common pattern within the structure of the audience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nicola



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 210
Location: Borehamwood, Herts

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think he means an audeience of the same sex, age, ethnic origin etc. I think he means that these artists have a collective audience. People that buy Katherine Jenkins albums, are also very likely to have a Russell Watson album or a Hayley Westenra album. Whoever has a Hayley Westenra album is likely to have a Charlotte Church album and so on. I think he is saying all the artists has an interlinked audience. If that's not what he meant, then sorry. But, that's also what I think is true anyway.
_________________
Comprehensive Buying Guide: Sarah Brightman's Discography
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
xotic
ClassicalX
ClassicalX


Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 489
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nicola wrote:
It was about crossover in general though and not just classical crossover (though it briefly mentioned it).

I think classical Crossover has gone further than what Wikipedia describes.


I agree. Maybe you should write an article on classical crossover there?! Your definitions where quite good, I think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xotic
ClassicalX
ClassicalX


Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 489
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nicola wrote:
I don't think he means an audeience of the same sex, age, ethnic origin etc. I think he means that these artists have a collective audience. People that buy Katherine Jenkins albums, are also very likely to have a Russell Watson album or a Hayley Westenra album. Whoever has a Hayley Westenra album is likely to have a Charlotte Church album and so on. I think he is saying all the artists has an interlinked audience. If that's not what he meant, then sorry. But, that's also what I think is true anyway.


Oh, I maybe got that wrong then. It sounds much more logical that way. Smile So if that's what it means, I totally agree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Doppleganger



Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 29
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nicola wrote:
I don't think he means an audeience of the same sex, age, ethnic origin etc. I think he means that these artists have a collective audience. People that buy Katherine Jenkins albums, are also very likely to have a Russell Watson album or a Hayley Westenra album. Whoever has a Hayley Westenra album is likely to have a Charlotte Church album and so on. I think he is saying all the artists has an interlinked audience. If that's not what he meant, then sorry. But, that's also what I think is true anyway.


No you got it right Nic, that is exactly what I meant. As for your rock analogy it's a very good example. No term is more abused or misused than 'Heavy Metal' when categorising heavy guitar-orientated music. It's more useful to me to define movements or 'scenes' rather than out-and-out genres. That way, you avoid the almost impossible task of 'labelling' every single artist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
xrainy
ClassicalX
ClassicalX


Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 796
Location: Russell corner

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i just see classical crossover as, artists who dont use all classical on their albums and dont use all pop on their albums. They use a mix of the two - sometimes even merging them on songs.
Pretty basic , but thats how i see it Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kcuteus



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 172

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that classical crossover can be say to be may things and many ways of having it. Like I think there are some people that are classical crossover artist and some people that are not that can have a crossover cd. than I think there are some people that are say to be classical crossover but there cds do not sound like they are much like that.

Like with Jose Carreras ,Placido Domingo ,Renee Fleming ,Lucianno Pavarotti they did classical crossover cds.

than you have people like Russell watson, Keedie, Katherine Jenkins, Amici Forever and more

than you have to ones like hayley westrana and josh groan.

I think it if hard to say what classical crossover is as it is what someone thinks it is. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephanie



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I define classical crossover as many thing's as it is late I we get into what I think about it latter and what artist I define as classical crossover .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nicola



Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 210
Location: Borehamwood, Herts

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It's more useful to me to define movements or 'scenes' rather than out-and-out genres. That way, you avoid the almost impossible task of 'labelling' every single artist.


I'm not sure that I am following this. What's the difference defining artists as a movement or 'scene' rather than defining them as a genre? Isn't that still labelling the artist? Question Confused
_________________
Comprehensive Buying Guide: Sarah Brightman's Discography
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Doppleganger



Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 29
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nicola wrote:
Quote:
It's more useful to me to define movements or 'scenes' rather than out-and-out genres. That way, you avoid the almost impossible task of 'labelling' every single artist.


I'm not sure that I am following this. What's the difference defining artists as a movement or 'scene' rather than defining them as a genre? Isn't that still labelling the artist? Question Confused


Because a movement or a scene is much less strict on terms of description - it's a much looser definition. For example, saying someone is into just Metal instead of he/she likes Black Metal bands, Speed Metal bands, Goth Metal bands, NWOBHM bands, Death Metal bands and all the hundreds of other types of Metal bands out there. Laughing

I hope I'm making sense. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classical X Forum Index -> General Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB
ALL ARTISTS | Aled Jones | Alex Prior | Alfie Boe | Alfio | All Angels | Amici Forever |
Andrea Bocelli | Blake | Bryn Terfel | Charlotte Church | David Garrett | Elin Manahan Thomas | Fron Male Voice Choir |
G4 | Geoff Sewell | Hayley Westenra | Il Divo | Jonathan Ansell | Josh Groban | Katherine Jenkins |
Kindred Spirits | Lesley Garrett | Libera | Mario Frangoulis | Misc | Natasha Marsh | Nick Garrett |
Nicky Spence | Nicola Benedetti | Opera Babes | Patrizio Buanne | Paul Potts | Russell Watson | RyanDan |
Sissel | The Choirboys | The Ten Tenors | Vittorio Grigolo | Will Martin |

Contact Us, Join Us

Powered by PHP-Nuke - Developed by tonicmedia
Page Generation: 1.11 Seconds

Welcome
Guest

or existing members login here